Thursday, December 16, 2010

Week 11 Final evaluation: Forced Choice

Best

Valencia, Eduardo http://eduardov425.blogspot.com/

Lucero, Chelsea Elizabeth http://chelzzlucero.blogspot.com/

Terheide, Melinda M http://terheidedesigns.blogspot.com/

Uy, Maria Feinila D. http://madeirich.blogspot.com/

Lee, Sean Anthony http://primarydesign702.blogspot.com/
Schmidt, Chase M.
http://colorblindproduction.blogspot.com/

Howard, Brett Carroll http://accudraft45.blogspot.com/
Bowman, Robert B.
http://bowmanlifestudios.blogspot.com/

Chambers, Everett Warren http://vegasinteriors.blogspot.com/

Casey, Daniella Erin http://daniella-casey.blogspot.com/

Angel, Renferd K http://angelaudioproduction.blogspot.com/

Smith, Cary Keola http://kotcc.blogspot.com/

Hardy, Tyrone http://cajogi.blogspot.com/

Orton, David Wayne http://vemg.blogspot.com/

Cordova, Jake Charles http://jakenstein151.blogspot.com/

Hearty, Raymond http://raygamepro.blogspot.com/

Hayford, Kristin http://rockabillybabydesigns.blogspot.com/

Lopez, Osvaldo http://ozzy702.blogspot.com/

Hasson, Keith http://keithhassonailvmma.blogspot.com/

Ferreira, Charles Edward http://champf.blogspot.com/
Beymer, Eric D.
http://ericbeymerphoto.blogspot.com/

Spencer, Randi J http://boysgrowup.blogspot.com/
Silvera, Richard Michael,, Jr
http://rmsfilms-richard.blogspot.com/
Hernandez, Edwin Jess
http://mogulvision.blogspot.com/

Worse

5. Your own argument and opinions. Did you agree or disagree with the rulings. Provide some authority for your argument such as quotes from the boo

In my field of Audio Production things are cut and dried for the most part. Its simple, if I don’t want anyone to potentially make money using something I created copyrighting is the first step to protection. To have exclusive rights pertinent to what I create. It is basically a deterrent. , it is like the alarm in my car and it will not prevent anyone from stealing it. It still will not prevent anyone from stealing it; it just gives me right to ownership. I may never know what will be good and what may be great; as long as I have legal ownership the world should know that I composed it. Money makes things absolutely complicated.

I agree with all of the answers that a lawyer gave. The key is in the specifics. Especially in, “joint works… The US Copyright Office will accept for registration works that meet this statutory definition and will treat the authors as having equal rights to register and enforce the copyright, regardless of what the joint authors arrange among themselves.”, )Patent Copyright & Trademark, Nolo pg275). I work with various audio engineers, artist and musicians alike. Things fly back and forth rather quickly and many people share in the same works to complete it. Potentially there is a lot of money to be made if any of the audio works become popular.

Specifically for audio, “There are two types of copyrights for music: musical works copyrights, which protect songs and compositions, and sound recording copyrights, which protect the manner in which music is arranged and recorded—that is, the sounds fixed on the recording…”, two types, but then we have to think about how that relates to the monies involved, and if those monies overlap or is divided in an obscure way. “…Songwriters earn income from the exploitation of songs. Recording artists and record companies earn money from the sale of recordings. The same person or business can own both types of copyrights, but the musical works copyright is usually owned by the songwriter or a music publisher, and the sound recording copyright is usually owned by a record company.”(Patent, Copyright & Trademark, pg282-283)

Being able to do the right thing and copyright my things seems like a tedious process, but essential role as an audio engineer. The copyright is governed by a federal agency, the US Copyright Office. Practically it is copyrighted for life, I am able to pass the ownership rights to generations below me, and this includes exclusive rights and potential monies generated on behalf of my original works. The process may have changed since the beginning of copyrights but the ethical aspects never changed…”I created it! Its mine and I have PROOF! Keoni Angel”

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

4. Rule of law -- a concise summary of the main precedent established. Support with quotes form the book

Question 1:

I am an audio composer. Some of my works may be in the media via television, radio, CD, DVD, Film. Some of my compositions may be in the form of original song, poems, music. How would I protect an original piece of audio and prevent people from performing it live at certained paid performances? Especially the original songs and music composition.

Answer 1:

The work should be registered with the US Copyright Office. You would then be able to obtain a court order preventing people from performing it without your permission.

Analysis/Summary 1:

It looks like after I have my works copyrighted, the use of the copyrighted material being perform can be obtained through what is called a “Compulsory License- Patent, Copyright & Trademark, pg224”, “The most common use of a compulsory license is in the music industry. Once a song has been recorded and distributed to the public on recordings, any person or group is entitled to record and distribute the song without obtaining the copyright ownersʻs consent, provided they pay a fee and meet copyright law requirements.” The copyright is defined as, “the exclusive right to make copies, authorize others to make copies, make derivative works, to sell (market), to display, to perform and to obtain court relief in the event others infringe these rights. Patent, Copyright & Trademark, pg231”

The last part was, “…to obtain court relief in the event other infringe these rights.”

However, in most cases instead of ordering a stoppage of the infringement, for the sake of my question, I can simply grant a ask for compensation if the would be infringer wishes to continue to use any of my works through a compulsory license. Ultimately I may gain a court order to halt any performance infringements.

In any case the types of damages would fall under one of three categories: “Actual damages(compensatory damages)…Profit damages… statutory damages… Patent, Copyright & Trademark, pg241-242”

Most of these damages are very hard to gain. You must first prove that you have copyrights, then you must prove that the infringer is actually “infringing”. In most cases this part of statutory law is overlooked because of it is very complex.

Question 2:

As an audio engineer, I may be called to design a ground up built for a mixing lab and/or mastering house. The designs will be strictly for acoustic purposes. It may involve sound absorbers and or deflectors that may swing out from walls. It also may include raised flooring. If I spec out a specific piece of room device or flooring, and the item injures someone. Can myself (as the room designer) be held liable for injuries incurred?

Answer 2:

There is a possibility that the designer could be held liable.

Analysis/Summary 2:

In my case my ground up builds will not make me an “inventor” of a patented interior design. I simply designed the build and am not constructing the build. Because my acoustic room design would not be patented, I am not subject to any damages should the building structure injure someone. It would fall under whatever agreement I had with the construction contractor.

If I draft something and copyright it, I would own exclusive rights to that particular design, it is called copyright of “architectural work, Patent, Copyright & Trademark, pg212-213” it is defined as “The appearance, architectural plans, drawings, or photographs of an architectural work (a building) cannot be reproduced without the consent of the owner of copyright in the architectural work-usually the architect or developer. There are some exceptions. For example, if the building is located in a place that is ordinarily visible to the public, photos or pictures of the building can be take, distributed, or publicly displayed. Patent, Copyright & Trademark, pg212-213”

Which means I can consult, build, suggest any acoustic room build, whether it is a mixing lab or a mastering house with out any design liability, in damages if anyone should get injured. On the other hand I cannot expect any compensation if ever someone where to copy the design of the build. The design will fall under public domain.

Question 3:

If I propose a design for a potential client and they refuse the design but use it regardless what can I do?

Answer 3:

If you still retain the copyright in the design and your copyright is registered with the US Copyright Office, then you could seek monetary damages and a court order preventing use of the design.

Analysis/Summary 3:

The lawyer stated that I must obtain a copyright for the design if ever I want to seek monetary damages and a court order preventing use of my design. If I don’t have the design copyrighted, I am not entitled and/or protected by copyright statutes.

Question 4:

If I work on a video project with a partner and it was free, but they sell it later can I be compensated?

Answer 4:

It depends. If you any your partner hold the copyright in the video project jointly, then you have an argument that you are entitled to compensation.

Analysis/Summary 4:

Assuming that I have “joint copyright ownership” of the piece of work, I am entitled to my share of the profits made. The term “Joint work, Patent, Copyright & Trademark, pg275” is defined as “a work prepared by two or more authors who intend to merge their contributions into inseparable, or interdependent parts of the whole. Patent, Copyright & Trademark, pg275.” Furthermore, “The US copyright office will accept for registration works that meet the statutory definition and will treat the coauthors as having equal rights to the register and enforce the copyright, regardless of what the joint authors arrange among themselves. Patent, Copyright & Trademark, pg275.” If there is a separate “partnership agreement”, it will over ride the basic statutory definition and the specific owner ship will fall under the “partnership agreement”.

Question 5:

If production work is created using a popular program, am I allowed to make money off of it?

Answer 5:

It depends on the situation. For example, if you use MS Word to write a novel, you are certainly entitled to make money from selling the novel.

Analysis/Summary 5:

In my case the program I will be using the most to compose original audio works is Pro Tools. They currently do not have rights for anything produced on that software platform. It is simply a mean and way to the creation. I am subject to benefit from any works completed using Pro Tools, and I may do so with out permission from the makers of Pro Tools. I have rightfully purchased the software, in which it grants me exclusive use of the software. No infringement incurred. And I am entitled to make money on anything that is created using it.

Question 6

If a film I worked on is produced and shown in theatres, and my name is left out of the credits is there anything I can do to be compensated?

Answer 6:

It depends on what role you played in the film and what contractual rights, if any, you have.

Analysis/Summary 6:

If I am indeed the “coauthor” of a film then I am entitled to any compensation under “joint copyright ownership, Patent, Copyright & Trademark, pg275”. If my name doesn’t appear in the “credits” portion of the film, there is nothing in the Statutes the directly pertains to “credits” of a work.

3. Reasoning of the Law -- analysis of the thinking process and logic used by your lawyer

Question 1: 

I am an audio composer.  Some of my works may be in the media via television, radio, CD, DVD, Film.  Some of my compositions may be in the form of original song, poems, music.  How would I protect an original piece of audio and prevent people from performing it live at certained paid performances?  Especially the original songs and music composition.

Answer 1: 

The work should be registered with the US Copyright Office.  You would then be able to obtain a court order preventing people from performing it without your permission.

Question 2:

As an audio engineer, I may be called to design a ground up built for a mixing lab and/or mastering house.  The designs will be strictly for acoustic purposes.  It may involve sound absorbers and or deflectors that may swing out from walls.  It also may include raised flooring.  If I spec out a specific piece of room device or flooring, and the item injures someone. Can myself (as the room designer) be held liable for injuries incurred?

 

Answer 2:

There is a possibility that the designer could be held liable. 

Question 3:

If I propose a design for a potential client and they refuse the design but use it regardless what can I do? 

Answer 3:

If you still retain the copyright in the design and your copyright is registered with the US Copyright Office, then you could seek monetary damages and a court order preventing use of the design. 

Question 4:

If I work on a video project with a partner and it was free, but they sell it later can I be compensated?

Answer 4:

It depends.  If you any your partner hold the copyright in the video project jointly, then you have an argument that you are entitled to compensation.   

Question 5:

If production work is created using a popular program, am I allowed to make money off of it?

Answer 5:

It depends on the situation.  For example, if you use MS Word to write a novel, you are certainly entitled to make money from selling the novel. 

Question 6

If a film I worked on is produced and shown in theatres, and my name is left out of the credits is there anything I can do to be compensated? 

Answer 6:

It depends on what role you played in the film and what contractual rights, if any, you have.

 


2. The Questions: Explain why these are of interest to you. What specific concepts and terms were involved – in other words, what are the legal issues

Brandon Davidson agreed to take 30 minutes out of his busy schedule in order to answer my questions to the best of his ability.  I agreed.  I took the ten questions that we had from our group session in class and chose the questions in which I thought he would be able to answer for me.  I also tailored the questions in a way in which I would understand it pertinent to me.

Most of my questions are dealing with copyrights and Intellectual Property.  It also involves compensation and or money damages.  I am interested to see how I can protect myself from basically benefiting from something that is rightfully mine.  I am going into the far stretches of audio engineering.  I want to see what are my limits.  So these are the questions that I asked Brandon.

Question 1: 

I am an audio composer.  Some of my works may be in the media via television, radio, CD, DVD, Film.  Some of my compositions may be in the form of original song, poems, and music.  How would I protect an original piece of audio and prevent people from performing it live at paid performances?

Question 2:

As an audio engineer, I may be called to design a ground up built for a mixing lab and/or mastering house.  The designs will be strictly for acoustic purposes.  It may involve sound absorbers and or deflectors that may swing out from walls.  It also may include raised flooring.  If I spec out a specific piece of room device or flooring, and the item injures someone. Can myself (as the room designer) be held liable for injuries incurred?

Question 3:

In the course of designing, I may draft a design that may be patented.  If I propose the design for a potential client and they refuse the design but use it regardless what can I do?

Question 4:

If I work on a video project with a partner and it was free when it was completed, but they later sell it, can I be compensated?

Question 5

If production work is created using a popular program, am I allowed to make money off of it?

Question 6

If I worked on a sound track for film and it is shown in theatres, and my name is left out of the credits is there anything I can do to be compensated? 

 

 

1. Legal Authority: How I made contact, found this person and why they are a good choice…

Searching around in Las Vegas for an entertainment lawyer or a lawyer that would be useful to me was irrelevant in my situation. I am probably destined to do business for audio production based out of Hawaii, with clients all over the west coast. The challenge is to work with a lawyer, or a group of lawyers, who can help keep me on the right track. I searched extensively on listings in Hawaii for lawyers who handle these types of things. I also fished through friends who are already in the business as well as family members who might have a contact waiting for me to send them an email and/or ring their phones of the hook. Made a few connections with random listings in NOLO.COM only to come up short of having, one on one attention with a lawyer. One of my aunties responded to my casting call for a lawyer that I put out on FACEBOOK.COM four days ago, “Desperately in need of a lawyer who deals with IP, or audio copyrights, will not pay, only seeking HONEST advice!”. She advised me that there was someone that might help. She works at the same company he does. The attorney’s name is Brandon Davidson. He heads the IP & Technology Law group of her company. He also supports Government Contracts & Procurement Group, and the Creditor’s Rights and Business Law Group. He also practiced environmental and residential lending matters. Wooooww! I think I just snagged something here. I thought, lets see what we can get out of this guy? I knew that some of the questions we came up with, as a group would not pertain to his area of practice. If I could only just make contact with him one way or another, it will shed more light into my path… lets see?

Thursday, December 9, 2010

Week 10 EOC: Robert Kearns’ vs Erin Brockovich

I think Erin Brockovich had a lot of intimacy with the clients that she represented and/or supported. Robert Kearns’ had, what I think more intimacy about his case than Erin did. Erin dealt with clients in a class action law suit, while Robert fought for his own cause. I think both stories were tremendous ethical battles. There is no difference with the way how these major companies with large budgets tried to manipulate the little man. These large corporations try to use their large budgets and room full of in house attorneys to bully the little man. Robert Kearns fought for over 2 decades while Erin Brockovich fought for a few years at most. Robert Kearns was trying to protect his invention patent and he was an inventor. I think most inventors who cracked something new would be paranoid about their inventions, and would be very apprehensive about sharing their invention. Erin on the other hand just developed an unknown compassion about the people she represented. I think Erin was not as interested in the ethical battle as much as Robert was. Robert ended up dragging his whole family into the ordeal, while his life passed him by. Also, Robert pretty much represented himself, so he had to learn how to somewhat represent himself in a way that would negatively affect the outcome of the case. To him it really was about the ethical principle about what happened and it wasn’t about the money. He had to turn down a $30million offer and ultimately was awarded only $10million plus the gratification of his invention. Ford wrongfully stole his invention and called it their own. I think Rober Kearns case was way bigger than Erin Brockovich’s. Roberts case was on a world wide scale, Erins Case was, at the most, state wide.